6 ms·
I think this is larger than just GAE. http://internettrafficreport.com/namerica.htm http://internettrafficreport.com/namerica.htm It seems like large portions
by davis_m 14y ago
I think this is larger than just GAE.
http://internettrafficreport.com/namerica.htm http://internettrafficreport.com/namerica.htm
It seems like large portions of the internet are down.
- untog 14y agoYes, Tumblr is experiencing difficulties and AFAIK they don't run anything on App Engine.
- sparkinson 14y agoNow those are some interesting graphs.
- FiloSottile 14y agoThe internet is burning :O Well, seriously what could be a root cause that affects so many nodes?
- bsaul 14y agoonly 51% of north american internet is working ?? Am i reading this correctly ?
- seldo 14y agoAs Ewantoo mentioned, ITR is pretty unreliable. We have found it works as a relative measure -- when their packet loss rises, we do indeed see consumer traffic fall, though usually not by the amount their graphs would indicate.
- EwanToo 14y agoYou're reading it correctly, it's just telling you the wrong thing. 51% of a very small self-selecting set of machines are down, mostly small businesses or home users which have obviously been shutdown or renamed. If internettrafficreport automatically removed all devices which returned no results for 7 days, they'd be a slightly more useful resource.
- cfontes 14y agoGreat find, I did not know this site.
- EwanToo 14y agoInternet Traffic Report, while a nice concept, is unfortunately very misleading. Their sample size is extremely small, and most of those are permanently down. Have a look through their list of north american routers and find one of them where packet loss has gotten worse as their main overall graph for packet loss would suggest - I've just been through them all and couldn't find one.
- obituary_latte 14y agoAgreed. I was surprised to see only one[1] of the "down" routers with any packet loss over the last 24 hours. That said, it's still interesting how the overall traffic trends so sharply downwards. I wonder if they have more data than they are showing in the graphs. [1]http://internettrafficreport.com/history/190.htm http://internettrafficreport.com/history/190.htm
- jre 14y agoIt seems like the individual router graphs most recent update is 10/26 00:00 whereas the overall graph has been updated at 10/26 08:30.
- calinet6 14y agoTheir baseline values are very misleading. But their relative metrics can still be useful. For example, it's very inaccurate to say that 51% of the internet is down. But it's precise to say that packet loss among the working nodes has increased about 30% in the last 24 hours, and sharply.
- EwanToo 14y agoBut that's likely 2 or 3 nodes, not a meaningful sample
- aidos 14y agoAdd Dropbox to that list.
- X-Istence 14y agoAnd here we have another website that does something similar: http://www.internetpulse.net http://www.internetpulse.net And according to them all routes are up and running just fine,not only that bit ping times aren't elevated.
- neanderdog 14y agoMay not be anything or may be.. I noticed a couple of days ago that some of our dns entries were mysteriously removed from level 3 servers which out of old habit are used for resolution (some of the ip's go back to uu-net/worldcom/mci) Now the interesting bit is they were for private subnet ip's. They're working fine everywhere else. Today the last of their dns servers removed the entries so I had users go to google (8.8.8.8) and all's well with our apps. Level 3's entries for our external stuff is there, just the private subnet stuff is removed. If others do this too and resolve with level 3.... edit: just found this: http://tracker.outages.org/reports/view/59 http://tracker.outages.org/reports/view/59
- j_baker 14y agoMy money is on Hurricane Sandy: http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/refresh/graphics_at3+shtml/084338.shtml?5-daynl http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/refresh/graphics_at3+shtml/084338.sh...