4 ms·
Point? I’m SRE on .Net project, we have been through 6-8-10 and its cost us about 2ish hours of work each time. As long as you don’t get crazy, .Net upgrades is
by stackskipton 8mo ago
Point? I’m SRE on .Net project, we have been through 6-8-10 and its cost us about 2ish hours of work each time. As long as you don’t get crazy, .Net upgrades is just matter of new SDK and runtime and away you go.
- tgtweak 8mo agoYou're talking about .net for server applications right? The discussion above is for client apps being distributed for windows endusers.
- stackskipton 8mo agoWe have a small MAUI part of the application, it's not massive but it's working fine with .Net Upgrades.
- rblatz 8mo agoJust ship a self contained build?
- tgtweak 8mo agoThis was a sidecar application distributed by literally millions of installs per day - so having a 25MB "self contained" build was out of the question - we were targeting KB-sized distributables not 10's of MB.
- croes 8mo agoA .net framework 4.8 app has zero hours of work. Why is it ok that you have to invest 2 times number of apps hours just because MS has such a short life cycle for its .NET versions.