3 ms·
This is typically solved by publishing reactions/corrections or in the case of news programs starting the next one with a retraction/correction. This happens i
by int0x29 8mo ago
This is typically solved by publishing reactions/corrections or in the case of news programs starting the next one with a retraction/correction. This happens in some academic journals and some news outlets. I've seen the PBS Newshour and the New York Times do this. I've also seen Ars Technica do this with some science articles (Not sure what the difference in this case is or if it will take some more time)
- hayleox 8mo agoOn their forum, an Ars Technica staff member said[1] that they took the article down until they could investigate what happened, which probably wouldn't be until after the weekend. [1]: https://arstechnica.com/civis/threads/journalistic-standards.1511650/#post-44249741 https://arstechnica.com/civis/threads/journalistic-standards...
- lukeschlather 8mo agoI'm not asking how you solve the problem of publications making mistakes, I'm asking how you know they're rewriting articles if there are no third-party records of article contents. You're talking about publications acting in good faith. I'm talking about publications using paywalls to make it easier to lie.