3 ms·
Growth in this context is that there are a larger volume of videos each year. So each year a single video is exponentially a smaller and smaller percentage of t
by weird-eye-issue 8mo ago
Growth in this context is that there are a larger volume of videos each year. So each year a single video is exponentially a smaller and smaller percentage of the total.
- raincole 8mo agoYeah and the math doesn't check out. For example, if in year N youtube has f(N) new video. Let assume f(N) = cN^2. It's a crazy rate of growth. It's far better than the real world Youtube, which grew rather linearly. But the rate of "videos that are older than 5 years" is still faster than that, because it would be cubic instead of quadratic. Unless the it's really exponential (it isn't), "videos that are older than 5 years" will always surpass "new videos this year" eventually.
- weird-eye-issue 8mo ago> Unless the it's really exponential (it isn't), "videos that are older than 5 years" will always surpass "new videos this year" eventually. Such a weird strawman argument that you are making up. You've over thought this so much that you are missing the forest from the trees
- whycombigator 8mo agoVideo sensors are continuously getting cheaper, better and more more prevalent over time. The trend is towards capturing all angles of everything, everywhere, at increasingly higher resolutions.