3 ms·
The sheer popularity of Markdown implies that there are some use cases for it. For example, Reddit uses Markdown exclusively, and I don't believe ALL their user
by thenomad 14y ago
The sheer popularity of Markdown implies that there are some use cases for it. For example, Reddit uses Markdown exclusively, and I don't believe ALL their users are highly tech-savvy.
Personally, I don't trust or use (if I can avoid it) any on-the-web WYSIWYG text editor, because a) they tend to be slow and clunky and b) it's difficult to predict what HTML they will turn out a lot of the time, and I will often end up needing to edit that HTML.
Also, for common blogging / commenting tasks, Markdown is as fast or faster to use than WYSIWYG editors. I've been faffing around with a forum that won't let me use Markdown recently, and forces me to use its clunky WYSIWYG editor to add lists into my posts. It didn't take long for me to start yearning for the simplicity of linebreak - asterisk - item rather than a multiple-click WYSIWYG process.
- bitcartel 14y agoIf we assume WYSIWYG editors keep on improving, at some point, they'll become good enough. What then for Markdown?
- falcolas 14y agoPersonally? I would still prefer to write plain text with a bit of simplistic markup. YMMV, but I've never been fond of WYSIWYG editors. I'd rather say what I mean, instead of say what this other guy thinks I mean.