Hm, this seems like a difficult argument to support. We shouldn't have laws because "the enemy" doesn't have laws, and thus they are moving faster? Okay, so "

Hm, this seems like a difficult argument to support. We shouldn't have laws because "the enemy" doesn't have laws, and thus they are moving faster? Okay, so "the enemy" or "national security" becomes a reason that can be cited for any reason, at any time, to abolish or ignore any and all regulation? In what world is that NOT the slippiest of slopes?