4 ms·
Then US military with EMP hardened equipment. It's not the technical aspects i have a problem with, it's the statement that US Military lacks skills to strike
by ari_elle 14y ago
Then US military with EMP hardened equipment.
It's not the technical aspects i have a problem with, it's the statement that US Military lacks skills to strike after EMP attack.
"we don't practice the same kind of map-in-hand training that would be useful after an effective EMP"
Like i've also stated: Maybe it wasn't meant to be that serious, maybe it even was meant to be funny.
Thanks anyway for clarifying this. I am intrigued.
Guess i will read into this topic in more detail :)
- SoftwareMaven 14y agoIf you want a good read on the effect of a massive EMP attack, read "One Second After"[1]. William R. Forstchen wrote it after presenting to the US Congress on the dangers of EMP, and having the presentation be largely ignored. 1. http://www.amazon.com/One-Second-After-William-Forstchen/dp/0765356864/ http://www.amazon.com/One-Second-After-William-Forstchen/dp/...