4 ms·
You probably don’t know what you’re talking about.
by elzbardico 9mo ago
You probably don’t know what you’re talking about.
- NewsaHackO 9mo agoWhy wasn't the C compiler it made impressive to you?
- kewscombinator 9mo agoI found this was the least impressive bit about it https://github.com/anthropics/claudes-c-compiler/issues/1 https://github.com/anthropics/claudes-c-compiler/issues/1
- NewsaHackO 9mo ago>I found this was the least impressive bit about it https://github.com/anthropics/claudes-c-compiler/issues/1 https://github.com/anthropics/claudes-c-compiler/issues/1 So, I just skimmed the discussion thread, but I am not seeing how this shows that CCC is not impressive. Is the point you're making that the person who opened the issue is not impressive?
- kortilla 9mo agoIt didn’t work without gcc and it was significantly worse than gcc with gcc optimizations disabled.
- NateEag 9mo agoLike everything genAI, it was amazing yet surprisingly crappy. Yes, the bear is definitely dancing. But a few feet away there's a world-class step dancer doing intricate rhythms they've perfected over twenty years of hard work. The bear's kind of shuffling along to the beat like a stoner in a club. It's amazing it can do it at all... but the resulting compiler is not actually good enough to be worth using.
- NewsaHackO 9mo ago>It's amazing it can do it at all... but the resulting compiler is not actually good enough to be worth using. No one has made that assertion; however, the fact that it can create a functioning C compiler with minimal oversight is the impressive part, and it shows a path to autonomous GenAI use in software development.
- uh_uh 9mo agoOK, but don't you see where this is going? The trajectory that we're on?