3 ms·
It is up to the websites to do that, and to the users to boycott those websites showing cookie popups.
by prmoustache 9mo ago
It is up to the websites to do that, and to the users to boycott those websites showing cookie popups.
- idle_zealot 9mo agoThe regulatory body could clarify that a DO NOT TRACK header should be interpreted as a "functional/necessary cookies only" request, so sites may not interrupt visitors with a popup modal/banner if it's set.
- jeroenhd 9mo agoThe do not track header was good enough in this German case: https://dig.watch/updates/german-court-affirms-legal-significance-of-do-not-track-signals-in-linkedin-case https://dig.watch/updates/german-court-affirms-legal-signifi... Having the EU decide on a technical implementation is more of a last ditch effort, like what happened with more than a decade of the EU telling the industry to get its shit together and unify under a common charging port.
- deleted 9mo ago[deleted]