4 ms·
https://github.com/tuanchauict/MonoSketch/blob/main/LICENSE https://github.com/tuanchauict/MonoSketch/blob/main/LICENSE
by meatmanek 8mo ago
https://github.com/tuanchauict/MonoSketch/blob/main/LICENSE https://github.com/tuanchauict/MonoSketch/blob/main/LICENSE
- GlacierFox 8mo agoWhy have you sent me the licence page for Monosketch? I'm commenting on comment about Monodraw...
- lsaferite 8mo agoI would assume they sent that because they were suggesting to support FOSS over closed-source software.
- meatmanek 8mo agoWhich of these two exchanges makes more sense? 1. > But [monodraw]'s not open, and can't be edited by those who want to. We should always support FOSS. > Absolutely we should. But [monodraw] isn't FOSS. 2. > But [monodraw]'s not open, and can't be edited by those who want to. We should always support FOSS. > Absolutely we should. But [monosketch] isn't FOSS. The first interpretation makes no sense to me, because you've agreed completely with the parent comment but worded the comment in a way that sounds like you're disagreeing.