3 ms·
> It is not automatic, even with vibecoding, getting out a good app/site that solves a need in an elegant, functional manner for the user. This feels like a vi
by hackyhacky 8mo ago
> It is not automatic, even with vibecoding, getting out a good app/site that solves a need in an elegant, functional manner for the user.
This feels like a vibecoded comment.
To address the "substance" of your "comment": yes, creating a polished product requires effort, but this is not a polished product: as pointed out by numerous commenters, it provides nothing new, and what it does provide is broken. Thus the GP's comment that it is vibecoded slop and not worth taking seriously.
- darkwater 8mo agoMy rhetorical question was broader, because GP comment was a generic one, not specific to this project. I would ask you to be more mindful in your replies.
- hackyhacky 8mo ago> My rhetorical question was broader, It doesn't matter, the answer is the same. Using vibecoding is less effort that not using it, so of late we see a lot of low-effort vibecoding projects, of which this is one. Ergo, vibecoding is an easily-spotted red flag for projects that are not worth taking seriously. > I would ask you to be more mindful in your replies. You should take your own advice. Also, don't be a dick.
- darkwater 8mo ago> It doesn't matter, the answer is the same. Using vibecoding is less effort that not using it, so of late we see a lot of low-effort vibecoding projects, of which this is one. Ergo, vibecoding is an easily-spotted red flag for projects that are not worth taking seriously. And the whole point of my initial reply was to question the definition of "effort". > You should take your own advice. Also, don't be a dick. I think your reply perfectly illustrates the situation. Not a fruitful discussion anyway, enjoy clicking down arrows.