3 ms·
But it's not open, and can't be edited by those who want to. We should always support FOSS.
by orangecoffee 8mo ago
But it's not open, and can't be edited by those who want to. We should always support FOSS.
- GlacierFox 8mo agoAbsolutely we should. But this one isn't FOSS.
- meatmanek 8mo agohttps://github.com/tuanchauict/MonoSketch/blob/main/LICENSE https://github.com/tuanchauict/MonoSketch/blob/main/LICENSE
- GlacierFox 8mo agoWhy have you sent me the licence page for Monosketch? I'm commenting on comment about Monodraw...
- lsaferite 8mo agoI would assume they sent that because they were suggesting to support FOSS over closed-source software.
- meatmanek 7mo agoWhich of these two exchanges makes more sense? 1. > But [monodraw]'s not open, and can't be edited by those who want to. We should always support FOSS. > Absolutely we should. But [monodraw] isn't FOSS. 2. > But [monodraw]'s not open, and can't be edited by those who want to. We should always support FOSS. > Absolutely we should. But [monosketch] isn't FOSS. The first interpretation makes no sense to me, because you've agreed completely with the parent comment but worded the comment in a way that sounds like you're disagreeing.