2 ms·
I don't have to prove it. I do it every single day at work in a real production codebase that my business relies on. And I don't remove jQuery every day. Maybe
by aurareturn 9mo ago
I don't have to prove it. I do it every single day at work in a real production codebase that my business relies on.
And I don't remove jQuery every day. Maybe the OP is right that Opus 4.6 sucks at removing jQuery. I don't know. I've never asked an AI to do it.
The moment you point it at a real, existing codebase - even a small one - everything falls apart.
This statement is absolutely not true based on my experience. Codex has been amazing for me at existing code bases.
- netdevphoenix 9mo agoExtraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. "Works on my machine" ain't it.
- aurareturn 9mo agoIs it an extraordinary claim that Opus 4.6 or GPT 5.3 works amazing on existing code bases in my experience? That's funny. I feel like it's the opposite. Claiming that Opus 4.6 or GPT 5.3 fails as soon as you point them to an existing code base, big or small, is a much more extraordinary claim.