2 ms·

For a native macOS app, there is also Monodraw [1], which is great. [1] https://monodraw.helftone.com https://monodraw.helftone.com

Apreche 8mo ago
Mono draw is in maintenance mode and non-free. Based on the name, pretty sure that Monosketch is an explicit replacement.
- lemontheme 8mo ago
  Maybe it's just more or less feature-complete? Was curious, as someone who hadn't heard of it before, so I checked the blog. Last post is from April last year and concerns public testing of a new release. That's not particularly old, if you ask me?
- jen729w 8mo ago
  Monodraw got an update the other week. It isn't being changed, but it doesn't need to. Great little app. And it's $10, once. Hardly breaking the bank.
  - orangecoffee 8mo ago
    But it's not open, and can't be edited by those who want to. We should always support FOSS.
    - GlacierFox 8mo ago
      Absolutely we should. But this one isn't FOSS.
      - meatmanek 8mo ago
        https://github.com/tuanchauict/MonoSketch/blob/main/LICENSE https://github.com/tuanchauict/MonoSketch/blob/main/LICENSE
        GlacierFox 8mo ago
        Why have you sent me the licence page for Monosketch? I'm commenting on comment about Monodraw...
        lsaferite 8mo ago
        I would assume they sent that because they were suggesting to support FOSS over closed-source software.
        meatmanek 7mo ago
        Which of these two exchanges makes more sense? 1. > But [monodraw]'s not open, and can't be edited by those who want to. We should always support FOSS. > Absolutely we should. But [monodraw] isn't FOSS. 2. > But [monodraw]'s not open, and can't be edited by those who want to. We should always support FOSS. > Absolutely we should. But [monosketch] isn't FOSS. The first interpretation makes no sense to me, because you've agreed completely with the parent comment but worded the comment in a way that sounds like you're disagreeing.
- merelysounds 8mo ago
  > Based on the name I think in this case the name alone is not enough to suspect a replacement; perhaps it’s just a similar product in the same domain (_mono_space visual editors).

Apreche 8mo ago

Mono draw is in maintenance mode and non-free. Based on the name, pretty sure that Monosketch is an explicit replacement.

lemontheme 8mo ago
Maybe it's just more or less feature-complete? Was curious, as someone who hadn't heard of it before, so I checked the blog. Last post is from April last year and concerns public testing of a new release. That's not particularly old, if you ask me?
jen729w 8mo ago
Monodraw got an update the other week. It isn't being changed, but it doesn't need to. Great little app. And it's $10, once. Hardly breaking the bank.
- orangecoffee 8mo ago
  But it's not open, and can't be edited by those who want to. We should always support FOSS.
  - GlacierFox 8mo ago
    Absolutely we should. But this one isn't FOSS.
    - meatmanek 8mo ago
      https://github.com/tuanchauict/MonoSketch/blob/main/LICENSE https://github.com/tuanchauict/MonoSketch/blob/main/LICENSE
      - GlacierFox 8mo ago
        Why have you sent me the licence page for Monosketch? I'm commenting on comment about Monodraw...
        lsaferite 8mo ago
        I would assume they sent that because they were suggesting to support FOSS over closed-source software.
        meatmanek 7mo ago
        Which of these two exchanges makes more sense? 1. > But [monodraw]'s not open, and can't be edited by those who want to. We should always support FOSS. > Absolutely we should. But [monodraw] isn't FOSS. 2. > But [monodraw]'s not open, and can't be edited by those who want to. We should always support FOSS. > Absolutely we should. But [monosketch] isn't FOSS. The first interpretation makes no sense to me, because you've agreed completely with the parent comment but worded the comment in a way that sounds like you're disagreeing.
merelysounds 8mo ago
> Based on the name I think in this case the name alone is not enough to suspect a replacement; perhaps it’s just a similar product in the same domain (_mono_space visual editors).