3 ms·
"blood libel" why do you have to use this term all the time? There is plenty of other words that describe what you want to say: fake news, disinformation, propa
by kombine 8mo ago
"blood libel" why do you have to use this term all the time? There is plenty of other words that describe what you want to say: fake news, disinformation, propaganda. Why do the likes of you insist on using "blood libel"?
- monideas 8mo ago[flagged]
- mmustapic 8mo agoBlood libel means harvesting blood for rituals. It has nothing to do with dropping bombs. Which Israel does, what's the controversy here?
- monideas 8mo ago[flagged]
- mmustapic 8mo agoWhy do you say it is propaganda?
- rexpop 8mo agoBecause Al Jazeera is a project of the Al Thani royal family whose chief aim is to exacerbate the external conflict to maintain Qatar's internal political stability.
- mmustapic 8mo agoBut the specific information in the article could still be true.
- rexpop 8mo agoSo could an infinite variety of motivated claims, but without a second source for it, I'd remain skeptical.
- mmustapic 8mo agoYes, you always need more sources, that's why I don't dismiss it as propaganda. It would not be the first time that a news org lies, and it would not be the first time that the IDF lies.
- kombine 8mo agoYou are trying to make it all about Jews, but they aren't any more special than any other people/religion on the planet. So let's use terms that could be applied to anyone. Anyway, this is beside the point, reporting on Israel's atrocities and its genocide in Gaza has been accurate for the most part, unlike the lies coming out of Israeli government or IDF.
- bell-cot 8mo agoFor those unfamiliar with that phrase: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/blood_libel https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/blood_libel In the current context, OP's use of "insane blood libel" is a very efficient way to communicate his interpretation of the article. And probably his cultural/political background and worldview. And his emotions on the subject. The terms you've suggested would, at best, be far less efficient for that purpose.