3 ms·
> I think the better path forward is more open, peaceful, extended discussion. There is a good format for two people to have a discussion in good faith: https:
by 01HNNWZ0MV43FF 8mo ago
> I think the better path forward is more open, peaceful, extended discussion.
There is a good format for two people to have a discussion in good faith: https://yesnodebate.org/ https://yesnodebate.org/
I'll start - Do you think it is good that federal agents are ignoring due process?
- pizzafeelsright 8mo agoNo. (for the sake of the game/time) Do I think it is happening? Probably. If so, Punish them? Yes. My turn? A hypothetical group of men with a swords are intent on doing something you disagree with. Would it be wise to attempt to stop them while unarmed and outnumbered?
- therobots927 8mo agoWhat’s with the sword talk? We don’t live in mediaeval England.
- pizzafeelsright 8mo agoIt's a metaphor for the power of death in the hands of others.
- therobots927 8mo agoOK Jordan Peterson
- btreecat 8mo agoDepends on the thing they intend to do. Is it chop down a tree that shouldn't be chopped down? I probably would need more people and equipment to effectively stop them because I'm probably not going to convince them with pretty words if they are already doing something that shouldn't be done. Is it try to kill a member of my family? Yeah I'd probably try to intervene sans weapons in order to prevent the loss of life of another family member. Context matters.