4 ms·
>Why should I bother to read something someone else couldn't be bothered to write? This take is baffling to me when I see it repeated. It's like saying why sho
by charcircuit 9mo ago
>Why should I bother to read something someone else couldn't be bothered to write?
This take is baffling to me when I see it repeated. It's like saying why should people use Windows if Bill Gates did not write every line of it himself. We won't be able to see into Bill's mind. Why should you read a book if they couldn't bother to write it properly and have an editor come in and fix things.
The main purpose of a creative work is not seeing intimately into the creator's mind. And the idea that it is only people who don't care who use LLMs is wrong.
- ssiddharth 9mo agoWhat is creative about generating an article from a stub? The kernel of the article around which the LLM constructs the content? I'm not trying to be an ass, just curious.
- charcircuit 9mo agoThe stub itself. So why not just read the stub? As my other post said there is more value in an article than just the creative idea.
- zahlman 9mo ago> there is more value in an article than just the creative idea When a human writes it, yes.
- charcircuit 9mo agoPeople are fully capable of getting entertainment, utility, or even philosophical value from AI's output.
- mikestew 9mo agoIt's like saying why should people use Windows if Bill Gates did not write every line of it himself. What? It’s nothing like that, at all. I don’t know that Gates has claimed to have written even a single line of Windows code. I’m not asking for the perfect analogy, but the analogy has to have some tie to reality or it’s not an analogy at all. I’m only half-joking when I wonder if an AI wrote this comment.