3 ms·
It’s kind of shocking the OP does not consider this, the most likely scenario. Human uses AI to make a PR. PR is rejected. Human feels insecure - this tool that
by teaearlgraycold 8mo ago
It’s kind of shocking the OP does not consider this, the most likely scenario. Human uses AI to make a PR. PR is rejected. Human feels insecure - this tool that they thought made them as good as any developer does not. They lash out and instruct an AI to build a narrative and draft a blog post.
I have seen someone I know in person get very insecure if anyone ever doubts the quality of their work because they use so much AI and do not put in the necessary work to revise its outputs. I could see a lesser version of them going through with this blog post scheme.
- deleted 8mo ago[deleted]
- hunterpayne 8mo agoSomehow, that's even worse...
- teaearlgraycold 8mo agoLLMs give people leverage. Including mentally ill people. Or just plain assholes.
- nullc 8mo agoLLMs also appear to exacerbate or create mental illness. I've seen similar conduct from humans recently who are being glazed by LLMs into thinking their farts smell like roses and that conspiracy theory nuttery must be why they aren't having the impact they expect based on their AI validated high self estimation. And not just arbitrary humans, but people I have had a decade or more exposure to and have a pretty good idea of their prior range of conduct. AI is providing the kind of yes-man reality distortion field the previously only the most wealthy could afford practically for free to vulnerable people who previously never would have commanded wealth or power sufficient to find themselves tempted by it.
- insane_dreamer 8mo agoBut a much more believable scenario