3 ms·
The assertion was that they're the bot owner. They denied this and explained the situation. Continuing to link to their profile/ real name and accuse them of s
by staticassertion 8mo ago
The assertion was that they're the bot owner. They denied this and explained the situation.
Continuing to link to their profile/ real name and accuse them of something they've denied feels like it's completely unwarranted brigading and likely a violation of HN rules.
- verdverm 8mo agoMaybe they shouldn't have been so snarky? https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/pull/31138#issuecomment-3890808045 https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/pull/31138#issuecom... be snarky, get snarky in return or violate HN guidelines themselves? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46991274 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46991274
- staticassertion 8mo agoThis is a shameful equivocation. This is "be snarky, get publicly dox'd and harassed".
- verdverm 8mo agoI'm not sure which way you are implying here, what is shamefully equated?
- staticassertion 8mo agoThe "snark" of opening the PR vs the "snark" of people dox'ing the guy who opened it.