3 ms·
>* I think it absolutely adds to the discussion. Until the conversation around Ai can get past this fundamental error of attributing "choice, "alignment", "reas
by coldtea 9mo ago
>* I think it absolutely adds to the discussion. Until the conversation around Ai can get past this fundamental error of attributing "choice, "alignment", "reasoning" and otherwise anthropomorphizing agents, it will not be a fruitful conversation. *
You call it a "fundamental error".
I and others call it an obvious pragmatic description based on what we know about how it works and what we know about how we work.
- goatlover 9mo agoWhat we know about how it works is you can prompt it to address you however you like, which could be any kind of person or a group of people, or as fictional characters. That's not how humans work.
- simianwords 9mo agoYou admitted it yourself that you can prompt it to address you however you like. That’s what the original comment wanted. So why are we quibbling about words?
- colpabar 9mo agothat's all that happens on this website