5 ms·
They could make a warning/inquiry first, allowing a dialogue to explain a murky case before damage is done by a 'unilateral' enforcement action. (Pretty sure th
by gojomo 14y ago
They could make a warning/inquiry first, allowing a dialogue to explain a murky case before damage is done by a 'unilateral' enforcement action. (Pretty sure that's what grandparent post meant.)
- untog 14y agoJust take a look at the number of spammers on Twitter, or (recently) Instagram. It's not even possible to open up a dialogue for every single instance of possible spam.
- gm 14y agoDude, you are missing completely the point. There's a vast difference between automatically dealing with spam in Twitter and shutting down a paying customer with legitimate (non-drone account) followers. And this is not about spam, it's about TOS violation, itself much more subjective than just spam. I suspect you've never been on the other side of this equation. Anyway, you are comparing apples to oranges.