3 ms·

The real bug here is to have unilateral action. It assumes you guys are infallible, which no human is.

• untog 14y ago
  Huh? I don't even know what that means. Of course Meetup needs to have unilateral action- they need to shut down spammers, etc.
  • gojomo 14y ago
    They could make a warning/inquiry first, allowing a dialogue to explain a murky case before damage is done by a 'unilateral' enforcement action. (Pretty sure that's what grandparent post meant.)
    • untog 14y ago
      Just take a look at the number of spammers on Twitter, or (recently) Instagram. It's not even possible to open up a dialogue for every single instance of possible spam.
      • gm 14y ago
        Dude, you are missing completely the point. There's a vast difference between automatically dealing with spam in Twitter and shutting down a paying customer with legitimate (non-drone account) followers. And this is not about spam, it's about TOS violation, itself much more subjective than just spam. I suspect you've never been on the other side of this equation. Anyway, you are comparing apples to oranges.