10 ms·
I think the general consensus is "do not buy" because there are no apps for it and it can't run Windows desktop apps. I would wait for the x86 version at the ve
by WayneDB 14y ago
I think the general consensus is "do not buy" because there are no apps for it and it can't run Windows desktop apps. I would wait for the x86 version at the very least.
http://techcrunch.com/2012/10/23/microsoft-surface-rt-review/ http://techcrunch.com/2012/10/23/microsoft-surface-rt-review...
http://gizmodo.com/5953866/microsoft-surface-rt-review-this-is-technological-heartbreak http://gizmodo.com/5953866/microsoft-surface-rt-review-this-...
- dpark 14y agoThat's hardly the "general consensus". http://www.anandtech.com/show/6385/microsoft-surface-review/12 http://www.anandtech.com/show/6385/microsoft-surface-review/... http://www.zdnet.com/hands-on-with-microsofts-surface-rt-can-it-hit-the-sweet-spot-7000006258/ http://www.zdnet.com/hands-on-with-microsofts-surface-rt-can... Disclosure: I'm pretty biased here, as a Microsoft employee.
- Karunamon 14y agoThose "reviews" offer no conclusions and are basically lists of facts. Fact is, the app store in it's current state is very, very weak. It currently has fewer applications on it than iOS did when its store first launched. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/App_Store_(iOS)#Number_of_launched_applications https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/App_Store_(iOS)#Number_of_laun... Also puzzling was the decision to include every piece of office except the most important one (Outlook) I'm honestly finding it hard to see a use case for this device. While I'm really looking forward to the full fledged version when it launches, the RT looks like a confusing solution in search of a problem.
- maskedinvader 14y agowell its an unfair comparison, the iOS store released much later than the iphone, here windows 8 is launching along with the store, so in contrast its a much better start !
- dpark 14y agoI like how you put "reviews" in quotes, so you can be dismiss them without addressing them. No conclusions? What are these?: > I don't believe Surface is perfect, but it's a platform I can believe in. ... If you're ok being an early adopter, and ok dealing with the fact that mobile devices are still being significantly revved every year, Surface is worth your consideration. If you've wanted a tablet that could begin to bridge the content consumption and productivity divide, Surface is it. > For a first-generation product, the Surface with Windows RT is astonishingly polished. ... I also expect the ecosystem around the Surface, notably productivity apps, to improve by leaps and bounds in the next year or so. ... Enthusiastically recommended. Just lists of facts? You think the AnandTech review is just a list of facts? Did you even look at it? 12 different sections proving in-depth coverage of everything from the battery to the cover. You can disagree but dismissing it as vacuous is simply disingenuous. No one disputes that the app store has fewer apps. How many apps do you have installed, though? I personally don't need 100K+ apps. I need the few that I actually need. Does the Windows App Store have what you need? If so, great. If not, either get something else or wait for the apps you need to arrive.
- sliverstorm 14y agoThe issue you run in to is what people consider reputable sources. If the only sources you trust are Gizmodo and TechCrunch, it certainly is a consensus. Though, at that point I think there are bigger questions to ask...
- WayneDB 14y agoOh, that is the general consensus. I'm sure of it and I have a sea of negative reviews to back that up. From the Anandtech review, final words - "If you're ok being an early adopter, and ok dealing with the fact that mobile devices are still being significantly revved every year, Surface is worth your consideration." That's a big "If". So, we're left with a single positive review by ZDNet out of many, many, many negative reviews.