3 ms·
Your objective has explicit instruction that car has to be present for a wash. Quite a difference from the original phrasing where the model has to figure it ou
by reliabilityguy 8mo ago
Your objective has explicit instruction that car has to be present for a wash. Quite a difference from the original phrasing where the model has to figure it out.
- bwat49 8mo ago> Your objective has explicit instruction that car has to be present for a wash. Which is exactly how you're supposed to prompt an LLM, is the fact that giving a vague prompt gives poor results really suprising?
- reliabilityguy 8mo agoIn this case, with such a simple task, why even bother to prompt it? The whole idea of this question is to show that pretty often implicit assumptions are not discovered by the LLM.
- J_cst 8mo agoThat's the answer of his LLM which has decomposed the question and built the answer following the op prompt obviously. I think you didn't get it.
- reliabilityguy 8mo ago> I think you didn't get it. I did get it, and in my view my point still stands. If I need to use special prompts to ask such a simple question, then what are we doing here? The LLMs should be able to figure out a simple contradiction in the question the same way we (humans) do.
- vardalab 8mo agoNot really a special prompt. It's basically my custom instruction to ChatGPT, the purpose of that instruction is to disambiguate my ramblings, basically. It's pretty effective. I always use speech to text, so it's messy and this cleanup really helps.