3 ms·
Apple & oranges. The only thing these 2 have in common is their name, the clojure version does a lot more. A definition of a similar keep fn in clojure would b
by zcam 14y ago
Apple & oranges. The only thing these 2 have in common is their name, the clojure version does a lot more.
A definition of a similar keep fn in clojure would be almost indistinguishable from your lisp example (it would just be more readable).
- dschiptsov 14y agoWho told you that more is better? Why we should have nested lets and all that boilerplate for a classic filter?
- simonb 14y agoBecause you then don't need the complexity (& boilerplate) of SERIES or LOOP the moment you want to do a series of transformations on a slightly bigger list.