3 ms·

> Here’s what’s genuinely interesting. That's my current AI detector smell. > He discontinued the blood exchange after data showed “no benefits.” A suspicious

> Here’s what’s genuinely interesting. That's my current AI detector smell. > He discontinued the blood exchange after data showed “no benefits.” A suspicious person might note that a vampire would say exactly this after the media got too interested. I don't think it's the media (clearly the younger generations are media friendly), it's probably pressure from the older vamps.

ZoomZoomZoom 8mo ago
> You know what else is far-seeing? A creature that has been alive for centuries. Well, hello there!
sgt 8mo ago
Yeah, that does sound pretty AI-ish / marketing-bloggy. It’s not wrong, but it has a few classic “AI vibes”. If you want, I can........oh no!!!!!! NO CARRIER
- throwaway173738 8mo ago
  Oh my gosh I’m so sorry about that. Let me correct my earlier post and assert with certainty that this post was not at all written by an AI.
prime_ursid 8mo ago
I felt the same way and came to the comments to see if anyone else smelled it. It's either AI-assisted writing or people are genuinely starting to write like how ChatGPT sounds. First, the structure of this satirical post is headings and bullet points. Fine, whatever, a lot of people write this way. Then there's the exhausting litany of super short sentence fragments. > He published this. Openly. In a book. As a priest. This is how airport novels and LinkedIn "thought leadership" clickbait is written, so ok, fine, I'll let it pass. Then I started to notice a lot of: "It's not X. It's Y" or "this isn't just A. It's B." > Feeding isn’t nutrition. It’s dialysis. Before LLMs, people weren't writing this way. At the risk of sounding like a curmudgeon: it's insulting to read, like the reader is a 5-year-old. When several of these smells pile up, I close the tab immediately and try to forget about it. This one was so egregious that I had to read the whole thing and then come to the comments to rant a bit.
- archagon 8mo ago
  The author has a bunch of AI stuff in their bio, so I assume this is partially or fully generated unless otherwise disclaimed. But hey, maybe someone can get an AI to read it.
- normie3000 8mo ago
  > it's insulting to read, like the reader is a 5-year-old. It's not ELI5. It's ELY5.
keyle 8mo ago
It had me at "The Twist".
avereveard 8mo ago
> This is a critical narrative shift. also this, having done a number of ai conspiracy for funsies, that's always the mid point however I don't mind ai slop, if it's creative and well thought out (and editorialized, as this seem to be)

ZoomZoomZoom 8mo ago

> You know what else is far-seeing? A creature that has been alive for centuries. Well, hello there!

sgt 8mo ago

Yeah, that does sound pretty AI-ish / marketing-bloggy. It’s not wrong, but it has a few classic “AI vibes”. If you want, I can........oh no!!!!!! NO CARRIER

throwaway173738 8mo ago
Oh my gosh I’m so sorry about that. Let me correct my earlier post and assert with certainty that this post was not at all written by an AI.

prime_ursid 8mo ago

I felt the same way and came to the comments to see if anyone else smelled it. It's either AI-assisted writing or people are genuinely starting to write like how ChatGPT sounds. First, the structure of this satirical post is headings and bullet points. Fine, whatever, a lot of people write this way. Then there's the exhausting litany of super short sentence fragments. > He published this. Openly. In a book. As a priest. This is how airport novels and LinkedIn "thought leadership" clickbait is written, so ok, fine, I'll let it pass. Then I started to notice a lot of: "It's not X. It's Y" or "this isn't just A. It's B." > Feeding isn’t nutrition. It’s dialysis. Before LLMs, people weren't writing this way. At the risk of sounding like a curmudgeon: it's insulting to read, like the reader is a 5-year-old. When several of these smells pile up, I close the tab immediately and try to forget about it. This one was so egregious that I had to read the whole thing and then come to the comments to rant a bit.

archagon 8mo ago
The author has a bunch of AI stuff in their bio, so I assume this is partially or fully generated unless otherwise disclaimed. But hey, maybe someone can get an AI to read it.
normie3000 8mo ago
> it's insulting to read, like the reader is a 5-year-old. It's not ELI5. It's ELY5.

keyle 8mo ago

It had me at "The Twist".

avereveard 8mo ago

> This is a critical narrative shift. also this, having done a number of ai conspiracy for funsies, that's always the mid point however I don't mind ai slop, if it's creative and well thought out (and editorialized, as this seem to be)