3 ms·
It probably boils down to the definition of the word artificial, and both options can be correct. Just that in this climate I'll take anything the FDA does as a
by close04 8mo ago
It probably boils down to the definition of the word artificial, and both options can be correct. Just that in this climate I'll take anything the FDA does as a move with ulterior, probably nefarious, reasons.
No artificial colors can mean "no artificially created (synthetic) color" or "no artificially added (not naturally in the product) color".
We have a precedent with "no added sugar" for things that already contain a lot of it, like fruit juices. So the distinction is between "no added coloring" and "no synthetic coloring".
- ziml77 8mo agoThat would be the right way to make this distinction. But of course the FDA is totally fine letting people be misled by ambiguity if it benefits the companies selling these products.
- IAmBroom 8mo ago"Mexican saffron", harvested from a plant unrelated to the crocus family. And completely devoid of saffron's flavor.