2 ms·
That isn’t remotely comparable. You’re asking someone to quietly alter someone else’s product, not selling the product to them. They didn’t pay him to change th
by Forgeties79 9mo ago
That isn’t remotely comparable. You’re asking someone to quietly alter someone else’s product, not selling the product to them. They didn’t pay him to change the extension, they bought it.
- ptx 9mo agoThey bought the permission to make changes to customer machines that had been granted to the seller by the customer. If it's just a sale of the source code, there's no problem. But what is bought is usually the pre-existing update channel (the installed base), precisely to be able to alter the product for existing users without explicitly informing them or asking for consent.
- Forgeties79 9mo agoI get what you’re trying to say but comparing selling your tool to pocketing money on the job to commit a crime is not the same thing.