4 ms·
I mean the code would be intermediate and not really kept around. Code could be any language llm would choose best depending on requirements.
by small_model 8mo ago
I mean the code would be intermediate and not really kept around. Code could be any language llm would choose best depending on requirements.
- f311a 8mo agoYou are living in a fantasy. We are nowhere near this, and engineers who understand fundamentals very well are the ones in demand.
- small_model 8mo agoWe will see, I still think we will need engineers who understand fundamentals, and yes we need to teach new devs these like we teach them how assembly, computer architecture works, even though we likely don't build our own compilers or hardware. But as time goes on there is less need to know about the lower levels.
- newswasboring 8mo agoThis is a trap. If you don't have control over your code you dont have control over the product. Someone, somewhere in the stack needs to understand how everything works.
- small_model 8mo agoSo you know every line of code in every framework/library/sdk you use! wow
- newswasboring 8mo agoNo but someone does. If something goes wrong, someone would be able to debug and fix it.
- small_model 8mo agoIndeed, his name is Claude
- sigseg1v 8mo agoI love using AI tooling but I'm not convinced it's safe to use straight to binary until we have 100% deterministic outputs from it.
- small_model 8mo agoWould two great developers produce the same output given a spec, probably not. The spec and validation would be part of the solution. The code can be different each time.
- newswasboring 8mo agoBro, Claude is not a person.