> I don't think anyone is arguing that the usefulness of these AIs for real projects started at GPT 3.5/4 Only not in retrospect. But the arguments about "if y

> I don't think anyone is arguing that the usefulness of these AIs for real projects started at GPT 3.5/4 Only not in retrospect. But the arguments about "if you're not using AI you're being left behind" did not depend on how people in 2026 felt about those tools retrospectively. Cursor is 3 years old and ok 4 years might be an exaggeration but I've definitely been seeing these arguments for 2-3 years.