4 ms·
The lower figure of 20W is pretty standard: go take a look at the battery in your laptop. Most Dells are 65Whr batteries - ie. 20W for 3 hours of battery life (
by jrabone 14y ago
The lower figure of 20W is pretty standard: go take a look at the battery in your laptop. Most Dells are 65Whr batteries - ie. 20W for 3 hours of battery life (to a first approximation, LiIon is a bit more complicated than that).
The ubiquitous small form factor PCs like the Optiplex 780 (http://www.dell.com/downloads/global/corporate/environ/comply/optix_780_dccy.pdf http://www.dell.com/downloads/global/corporate/environ/compl...) use a 235W (max) power supply, which will be overspecced to trade off failure rates for manufacturing cost. Those machines actually draw less than 150W flat out. And they're everywhere. A certain large e-tailer with an emphasis on frugality used to use them as developer desktops(!).
Who knows what's in a typical consumer beige box, but it isn't pulling 500W continuously, unless they're playing, say, Skyrim 24/7 with a big graphics card - in which case of course one would specify the correct (safe) component for the design. I'd argue that they're not typical by that point; most people won't spend £300 on a graphics card (I do).
- cmccabe 14y agoSo to recap: * You point a to 235W power supply as an example of the bare minimum PC power supply-- not too far from my 300W round number. * You point out that a power supply rated for X isn't drawing X continuously-- a true statement, but it's responding to an argument nobody made. You have to pick a power supply which is rated for your max load-- everyone knows that, or should. It still doesn't change the fact that both max load and average load for X86 are orders of magnitude greater than for most ARM devices.