I want to believe the FDA did a non-political thing here, and it's an argument about marginal benefits in the 40,000 patient survey, against methodology issues

I want to believe the FDA did a non-political thing here, and it's an argument about marginal benefits in the 40,000 patient survey, against methodology issues had they used the vax recommended for over 65s. Just 'you didn't test best in breed with your new better in breed' But, I suspect thats not whats going on. I truly suspect, even though its conspiracy theory, they wanted a flex as the vaccine approvals board, and this is the flex they chose. I don't respect this approvals board. I think its stacked. I'm not a med, an epidemiologist or a bio person. What do I know, it's down to news and public disclosures.