> If there are clues that something is bad I just get the f&$k away from it until a few hundreds years of testing have concluded which I see as common sense. T

> If there are clues that something is bad I just get the f&$k away from it until a few hundreds years of testing have concluded which I see as common sense. That's all fine. You might have a different risk profile. You might think the scientists have been captured by industry or whatever. You can even say "[x] is harmful". Where you get into trouble is when you go around claiming "medical consensus" or whatever, when such consensus clearly doesn't exist.