5 ms·
this is where your US infinite detention becomes interesting. Both Obama and Romney support the infinite detention of American citizens without trial, but most
by cubicle67 14y ago
this is where your US infinite detention becomes interesting. Both Obama and Romney support the infinite detention of American citizens without trial, but most people aren't worried as it's "only for the bad guys"
What happens when you get on the bad side of the gov, like this guy? Declare someone a Domestic Terrorist and you can lock them away for good. Sure, it almost certainly won't be used in this case but that's not the point; the option shouldn't event exist
anyway, good on the guy. Rosa Parks hyperbole aside, what's the problem with people trading in gold coins if they like? more power to them
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]
- wseymour 14y agoI think you should be stating _which_ economic theory you claim to know. Those who subscribe to the Austrian school of economics, for example, might argue that allowing banks to print their own currency which represents their gold holdings, is _more efficient_ and less liable to failure than the centralised fiat system we have right now.
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]
- jQueryIsAwesome 14y agoDemocracy (+Capitalism) is not working for many countries and USA is the best example, I honestly think that even monarchy would be better; there is a small chance a prince would happen to grow up to be an intelligent good person but in your system the only 2 candidates are cherry picked by the people with very deep pockets trying to make those deeper.
- boon 14y agoSpot. On. When the laws can be used to put anyone in jail for just "annoying" the "civilized and obviously good for you" status quo, you are in big trouble.