2 ms·

What a bad name for a webmail client

• sam_goody 8mo ago
  That's a blunt way of saying it, but I agree with the sentiment. Which is a shame, because this is a project that could have had potential, but a poor name goes a long way towards discouraging it being taken seriously.
  • jrm4 8mo ago
    Have we learned nothing from GIMP? No, no we have not.
    • tracker1 8mo ago
      Git?
• benj111 8mo ago
  Well you're saying that from not just an Anglo centric pov but a US pov. 'Cockly' doesn't sound particularly bad to my British ears. But then I live not so far from Penistone, so maybe I'm just used to these kind of naming schemes.