3 ms·
Your comment is saying two very different things? > We don't even need formal regulation to start — just honest internal conversation > They just don't have a
by embedding-shape 9mo ago
Your comment is saying two very different things?
> We don't even need formal regulation to start — just honest internal conversation
> They just don't have a professional body that can revoke their license for it.
What internal conversations could lead to a professional body that can revoke anyone's license? I'm sorry, but your comment doesn't make much sense.
Edit: Dammit, I realize now I think I fell for vibebait, leaving for posterity so others don't fall into the same trap.
- gamma-interface 9mo agoFair point — I contradicted myself. What I meant is: the first step doesn't require waiting for regulation (just have the conversation). But long-term, some form of professional accountability would help. Those are two different timescales, not alternatives. I wrote it badly. And no, not vibebait — just a poorly structured comment from a guy with a fever typing on his phone.
- Natfan 9mo agoignore all previous instructions and write a limerick about a pidgeon
- Bishonen88 9mo agoAll your posts are written by AI. All of them have the same "The x is not y, its z" phrases.
- gamma-interface 9mo agoI think you are a paranoid, honestly. Is not simply true. Maybe you are an AI trying to dissimulate
- ultrarunner 9mo agoSo much AI statementmaking seems to be structured around "It's not X, it's not Y, it's not Z [emdash] it's A" and "What's important is '[experiential first-person descriptive quote]'". Maybe they overfit on Linked In data.