3 ms·
You didn't actually flip it around at all. They're stating they doubt Meta would ever allow full e2ee, which is not evidence but simply speculation. AND They
by saintfire 8mo ago
You didn't actually flip it around at all.
They're stating they doubt Meta would ever allow full e2ee, which is not evidence but simply speculation.
AND
They asked for a source/evidence to prove their hunch is more than speculative.
- ses1984 8mo agoWhat standard of proof is required here? It’s not criminal court. The original post I replied to simply asked for proof, without also stating they doubt meta would ever allow e2ee. My post is more directed at other readers who might take the absence of a smoking gun as an assumption of safety.