2 ms·
I am not sure I understand what you’re saying. If meta can read those messages, then they’re most definitely not e2e encrypted. Given the historical record, y
by ses1984 8mo ago
I am not sure I understand what you’re saying.
If meta can read those messages, then they’re most definitely not e2e encrypted.
Given the historical record, you would be a fool to assume that any service run by a public company isn’t fully tapped by US intelligence agencies. They’ve been tapping anything and everything they can get their hands on, why stop at whatsapp?
Let me flip it around: what proof do you actually have that it is e2e encrypted? Zuckerberg pinky promised?
- saintfire 8mo agoYou didn't actually flip it around at all. They're stating they doubt Meta would ever allow full e2ee, which is not evidence but simply speculation. AND They asked for a source/evidence to prove their hunch is more than speculative.
- ses1984 8mo agoWhat standard of proof is required here? It’s not criminal court. The original post I replied to simply asked for proof, without also stating they doubt meta would ever allow e2ee. My post is more directed at other readers who might take the absence of a smoking gun as an assumption of safety.