It really depends. Experiments comparing the effects of animated maps and "small multiples" are mixed: "We found that map readers answer more quickly and ident

It really depends. Experiments comparing the effects of animated maps and "small multiples" are mixed: "We found that map readers answer more quickly and identify more patterns correctly when using animated maps than when using static small-multiple maps. We also found that pace and cluster coherence interact so that different paces are more effective for identifying certain types of clusters (none vs. subtle vs. strong)."[1] "In cases where animated graphics seem superior to static ones, scrutiny reveals lack of equivalence between animated and static graphics in content or procedures; the animated graphics convey more information or involve interactivity. Animations of events may be ineffective because animations violate the second principle of good graphics, the Apprehension Principle, according to which graphics should be accurately perceived and appropriately conceived. Animations are often too complex or too fast to be accurately perceived." [2] [1] http://www.geogra.uah.es/patxi/griffin06_mapas_animados.pdf http://www.geogra.uah.es/patxi/griffin06_mapas_animados.pdf [2] http://web.cs.dal.ca/~sbrooks/csci4166-6406/seminars/readings/Tversky_AnimationFacilitate_IJHCS02.pdf http://web.cs.dal.ca/~sbrooks/csci4166-6406/seminars/reading...