3 ms·
> and to likely sell to 3rd parties. Can you provide literally any evidence that would suggest this is the case?
by Permit 8mo ago
> and to likely sell to 3rd parties.
Can you provide literally any evidence that would suggest this is the case?
- DaSHacka 8mo agoGive it a couple years for the inevitable data breach to leak all the details
- ted_bunny 8mo agoThis sort of thing is common enough that simply establishing means, motive and opportunity are convincing to me. If not yet then soon. You can't hope for a smoking gun every time.
- randunel 8mo agoSince selling PII is a common practice in the US industry, I believe the onus is reversed, they need to prove that they delete/keep-private.
- moffkalast 8mo agoYep, that's my reasoning too.
- matt_kantor 8mo agoGiven how YouTube makes money from advertising, I suspect it's more profitable for them to keep the data to themselves and use it for targeting. I would not be surprised if they also share it with Adsense & other Alphabet entities (and presumably with government agencies), but am doubtful beyond that. Not that this is much better than directly selling to third parties.