3 ms·

Self hosted GitLab is absolutely worth it.

• sam_lowry_ 8mo ago
  Self-hosted git is absolutely worth it.
• monkaiju 8mo ago
  or forgejo!
  • zhouzhao 8mo ago
    Yeah man. Forgejo (albeit it being a weird name from a language that nobody wants to use), is doing very well in my homelab. When I worked at the univerity we used Gitea. Every job outside of univerity I had used Gitlab self hosted. While I don't like the UI or any aspect of Gitlab a lot, it gets the job done.
    • zer00eyz 8mo ago
      I use Gitea already... I haven't seen Forejo before today. Im now curious if it is worth the switch.
      • terminalbraid 8mo ago
        Forejo was originally forked from Gitea
  • DeepYogurt 8mo ago
    Forgejo should 100% be people's default for self hosting
• edverma2 8mo ago
  I was just looking into this today but it seems pricey. $29/user/month for basic features like codeowners and defining pr approval requirements. Going with Forgejo.
  • 1f60c 8mo ago
    Wait, what? So you're on the hook for backups, upgrades, etc. and you have to pay them for the privilege? I thought GitLab was free as in speech and beer.
    • cyberax 8mo ago
      It's an Open Core model. You can deploy the free version, but it lacks some pretty important features like SSO. But that $30 per month per user is also the cost for their cloud-hosted version. It also includes quite a bit of CI/CD runtime.
  • deleted 8mo ago
    [deleted]
  • rcakebread 8mo ago
    Forgejo isn't comparable.
• vampiregrey 8mo ago
  I think i will slowly start moving to self hosted git intra at my homelab.
• blibble 8mo ago
  forgejo doesn't need half a supercomputer to run it
• deleted 8mo ago
  [deleted]