2 ms·
> The same doesn't apply to airpods. It doesn't today because they don't have cameras on them, it won't tomorrow if they do. People will definitely need to jus
by Someone1234 8mo ago
> The same doesn't apply to airpods.
It doesn't today because they don't have cameras on them, it won't tomorrow if they do. People will definitely need to justify (maybe legally), why they're pointing the camera on their AirPods at people changing.
> Is there any indication that you'll be able to get a video feed from airpods?
You're just repeating the same "internal processing" point you've made, and that I've already pointed out isn't a legal or practical difference in the real world.
- gruez 8mo ago>You're just repeating the same "internal processing" point you've made, and that I've already pointed out isn't a legal or practical difference in the real world. You're not answering my question. Do you or do you not think that face id phones are facing legal obstacles because they also have cameras that randomly turn on for "internal processing"? If face id phones get a pass, why don't you think airpods would get a pass?