3 ms·
Running it entirely unsupervised with “some refactoring principles” is the exact recipe for such a disaster, which supports my point. That said, this is a very
by jama211 8mo ago
Running it entirely unsupervised with “some refactoring principles” is the exact recipe for such a disaster, which supports my point.
That said, this is a very different kind of mistake to make compared to overwriting a file and then insisting it didn’t do that. Any modern model with reasoning would check the git history immediately if you mentioned this had happened, if it had somehow even made the mistake in the first place, but I digress.
- burnerToBetOut 8mo ago> …this is a very different kind > of mistake to make compared > to overwriting a file… Both of my quotes are about some automaton deleting some thing that some human didn't want deleted. > …but I digress… Digressing to what the thing is that got deleted when it shouldn't have, is splitting hairs. > …which supports my point… My point is that believing the latest and greatest version of any piece of software from any brand to be immune to Murphy's Law, seems pretty naïve.
- jama211 8mo ago> seems pretty naive I had cereal for breakfast this morning > is splitting hairs I’m a chocolate ice cream guy myself, over strawberry that is. — Sorry, just wanted to join the “quote random parts of a comment and then state completely unrelated statements for unknown reasons” club.