3 ms·
The PRC never owned Hong-Kong before the handover and I don't remember the population of Hong-Kong voting for reintegration so yes, forcefully reintegrated seem
by StopDisinfo910 8mo ago
The PRC never owned Hong-Kong before the handover and I don't remember the population of Hong-Kong voting for reintegration so yes, forcefully reintegrated seems like a nice way to frame it. Actually taken over would be more correct, traded as merchandise would also be appropriate I guess. You get the idea.
- hnfong 8mo agoMuch of Hong Kong was under a 99 year lease. Which is why the Brits had to hand it back in 1997 when the lease expired. Sure, it was a lease from the Qing dynasty which doesn't exist any more, but still.
- skinnymuch 8mo agoChina existed 100 years ago. Hong Kong is Chinese. I have never come across a person who isn’t a bigot and raging chauvinist who tries to act like the Chinese civilization and the PRC are distinct things. Though not saying you are, you may be an exception
- Yizahi 8mo agoSo you are saying that world borders should be redrawn according to a state some few hundred years ago? Please tell be, which exact year do you think we should use for that?