3 ms·
Is it really that much better than alternatives to justify these constant outages?
by tapoxi 8mo ago
Is it really that much better than alternatives to justify these constant outages?
- vvilliamperez 8mo agoYou can self-host GitHub enterprise.
- riffic 8mo agoself-host your own services. There are a lot of alternatives to GitHub.
- dsagent 8mo agoWe're starting to have that convo in our org. This is just getting worse and worse for Github. Hosting .git is not that complicated of a problem in isolation.
- bigfishrunning 8mo agoNo, but it has momentum left over from when it was much better. The Microsoft downslide will continue untill there's no one left
- tacker2000 8mo agoIm using Bitbucket for years with no issues.
- onraglanroad 8mo agoThe great advantage of Bitbucket is that it's so painfully slow you can't tell if it's down or not.
- jeltz 8mo agoNot any longer. It used to but the outages have become very common. I am thinking about moving all my personal stuff to Codeberg.
- azangru 8mo agoI love its UI (apart from its slowness, of course). I find it much cleaner than Gitlab's.
- rvz 8mo agoIt always has been to just self host. Predicted GitHub's outage streak as far back as half a decade ago [0]. "A better way is to self host". [0] [0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22867803 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22867803
- shimman 8mo agoYes, for personal projects I just self-host an instance of forgejo with dokploy. Everything else I deploy on codeberg, which is also an instance of forgejo.
- deleted 8mo ago[deleted]