Does this have an alternative market-based solution? I see a big problem with job scams from "legitimate" companies advertising jobs they have no plans to fulf

Does this have an alternative market-based solution? I see a big problem with job scams from "legitimate" companies advertising jobs they have no plans to fulfill or which do not exist at all. They seem to do this because they employ HR and recruiters, and it looks good if job openings are on their site. It's a real problem. I believe there could be a solution: charge $500 to post an opening and give $50 to each of ten AI-vetted qualified candidates. That means the candidate had a real job interview and passed it without AI assistance. They get $50 to interview. If the company doesn't hire any of ten qualified candidates, then they can pay another $500, or stop pretending that the job they're advertising for is real. What do you think of this novel model? On the candidate side, it allows them to interview once and then only be called into a job interview if they're being paid $50 to do so. The system could also go the other way and prevent candidates from making interviewing their living, by only inviting them to a limited number of interviews with job offers on the table - such as three such interviews job offers. After that they don't get more job offers since they're not really on the market. The AI could also represent salary reality more transparently. Basically, overall it should be the companies hiring that pay, not candidates who have lots of their time wasted. What do you think of such a market-based approach?