If you cursorily examine the history of anarchism, there are those who seek to achieve a violent revolution, and there are those who seek to achieve a peaceful

If you cursorily examine the history of anarchism, there are those who seek to achieve a violent revolution, and there are those who seek to achieve a peaceful revolution. It's of course reasonable to keep an eye on seditious groups: these almost by definition imperil life, liberty, property, etc. It is another thing altogether to keep an eye on someone who wants to peacefully change government via peaceful and lawful means.