4 ms·
Oh, I missed that! That gives a longest in NZ of 365.3 km from Ruapehu, skirting past close by Tapuae-o-Uenuku (in the Inland Kaikoura Range) to a point on the
by brucehoult 8mo ago
Oh, I missed that!
That gives a longest in NZ of 365.3 km from Ruapehu, skirting past close by Tapuae-o-Uenuku (in the Inland Kaikoura Range) to a point on the Seaward Kaikoura Range near the peak of Manakau. Clicking on the actual Manakau peak also gives 365.3 km back to Ruapehu.
I can't seem to find a peak to get a reverse path back to Mt Ranier. Everything I try gets stuck in the Olympic Peninsular. (I was there once ... 1998 or so ... a place called Hurricane Ridge IIRC)
- tombh 8mo agoRight, I think we need to make that "In current viewport" thing more prominent somehow. So this is the NZ longest line right https://map.alltheviews.world/longest/173.61386108398438_-42.22415542602539 https://map.alltheviews.world/longest/173.61386108398438_-42... One thing to note about finding reverse lines, is that they're not truly mathematically identical because the observer always has a height of 1.65m and the destination is always some point at the surface, therefore 0.0m. It doesn't always make a difference, but it sometimes can.
- brucehoult 8mo ago> So this is the NZ longest line right Yup. I'd think so. > It doesn't always make a difference, but it sometimes can. I guess the obvious case is if there's a point near one end that is higher, but less than 1.65m higher. It really might be better to use ground level at both ends. Or at least the same height at both ends e.g. if there is a person on both peaks.
- tombh 8mo agoThe thing about the observer height that I always try to remember is that features really close to the observer can make an exponential difference. Like imagine how simply putting hand in front of your eyes can suddenly make the whole world disappear. So in theory, it is possible that a mere change of a few centimeters in the height of the observer could affect a similarly dramatic change in the view.