3 ms·
Your response is, completely expected, an appeal to outrage. You’re asserting that account age shouldn’t matter, and that any scrutiny is morally illegitimate.
by stingraycharles 9mo ago
Your response is, completely expected, an appeal to outrage.
You’re asserting that account age shouldn’t matter, and that any scrutiny is morally illegitimate.
Nobody is discriminating against you. It’s just that account age is one of the few signals that an online platform has to go by.
HN absolutely recognizes this in their policy, considering that they give new accounts an entirely different color to make them stand out from the rest, and that they don’t allow downvotes unless your account has achieved a certain karma level.
- joe_mamba 9mo ago>Your response is, completely expected, an appeal to outrage. How do you react towards ageism and discrimination? >It’s just that account age is one of the few signals that an online platform has to go by. None of that invalidates or even addresses my arguments. It's still about exclusion of people based on account date rather than WHAT they say. >HN absolutely recognizes this in their policy, considering that they give new accounts an entirely different color to make them stand out from the rest, and that they don’t allow downvotes unless your account has achieved a certain karma level. Except that my account is not green, and I AM allowed to downvote.
- jamespo 9mo agoHey it's not just ageism, you're also anonymous!
- joe_mamba 9mo agoThe goalposts always move whenever you want to discredit someone but don't have any valid counter arguments to their arguments. It's either the age of your account, the karma you have, your username, anything but saying why your argument is wrong.
- jamespo 9mo agoNever mind you can start another alt
- gosub100 9mo agoDid you check what zodiac sign the account was created under too? That's another signal for you.