4 ms·

Like for example: I don't know, sometimes I'm cooking for my partner. Do they hear a one-sided conversation between me and the "Live AI" about what to do first,

Like for example: I don't know, sometimes I'm cooking for my partner. Do they hear a one-sided conversation between me and the "Live AI" about what to do first, how to combine the ingredients? Without the staged demo's video-casting, this would have been the demo: a celebrity chef talking to himself like a lunatic, asking how to start. I think this is one of those things that society just adapts to. Some people will be in the kitchen talking to "themselves" but that's okay, people understand why. My Mom would often talk to herself when cooking anyway. She was a verbal processor. You just get used to it and eventually it doesn't seem weird anymore.

coffeefirst 9mo ago
That’s fine. I cook. I’ve got my AirPods in listening to music and talk to an iPad with my recipe on it to set timers and the like. And sometimes I talk to my Dutch oven because it has feelings. Voice control makes a lot of sense in cooking because my hands are messy. I’m just not sure what the glasses are for that could be fun or helpful while cooking. The demo video is… amusing but also wrong, because you’d need to have the recipe before you setup your ingredients.
- jaapz 9mo ago
  The glasses could present a recipe as actions needing to be taken in the field of view, instead of as a bulletpoint list in a book. And the glasses could use the video stream from the glasses to improve help an AI may give during cooking. Then again, I don't see myself using them. I also cook and I'd rather just internalize processes and recipes, and something like this would make it way too easy to just rely on the glasses to "know" everything.
- unsnap_biceps 9mo ago
  I tried cooking with a Vision Pro. It was nice to throw up the recipe above the prep area, hovering, so I could prep and check off without messing up a book or print a copy just for single use. I also liked throwing up a timer above each pot so it was simple to glance at the stove and see how long each pot had on it. But the Vision Pro is bulky, hot, and heavy. I wouldn't try it again. I could imagine giving it another go with glasses, but I wouldn't be using the AI part of it.

coffeefirst 9mo ago

That’s fine. I cook. I’ve got my AirPods in listening to music and talk to an iPad with my recipe on it to set timers and the like. And sometimes I talk to my Dutch oven because it has feelings. Voice control makes a lot of sense in cooking because my hands are messy. I’m just not sure what the glasses are for that could be fun or helpful while cooking. The demo video is… amusing but also wrong, because you’d need to have the recipe before you setup your ingredients.

jaapz 9mo ago
The glasses could present a recipe as actions needing to be taken in the field of view, instead of as a bulletpoint list in a book. And the glasses could use the video stream from the glasses to improve help an AI may give during cooking. Then again, I don't see myself using them. I also cook and I'd rather just internalize processes and recipes, and something like this would make it way too easy to just rely on the glasses to "know" everything.
unsnap_biceps 9mo ago
I tried cooking with a Vision Pro. It was nice to throw up the recipe above the prep area, hovering, so I could prep and check off without messing up a book or print a copy just for single use. I also liked throwing up a timer above each pot so it was simple to glance at the stove and see how long each pot had on it. But the Vision Pro is bulky, hot, and heavy. I wouldn't try it again. I could imagine giving it another go with glasses, but I wouldn't be using the AI part of it.